| Local News |
Council Members Explain Stimulus 'No' Votes
Some City Council members are taking a stand against the stimulus on a local level.
Four council members bucked the rest of their colleagues and voted to turn down federal money for a police training program.
Councilman Clay Yarborough voted against the money. He said his objection is not about what the money was for.
"My reason to vote against the bill, as did a few other council members, was because of the source of the funds," Yarborough said.
He thinks if more city turn down the money it would send a bigger message to Washington that they don't approve of the stimulus plan.
That is similar to objections from Councilman Steven Joost.
"To me it is a waste of money. This is a waste of taxpayer money," Joost said.
Two other members, Michael Corrigan and Bill Bishop, voted to turn down the money.
Bishop said he would consider voting for other projects if they could prove that they would bring in more jobs, but this did not meet his standard.
The sheriff supported the money, saying national battles do not need to be fought on the local level and that the money would go to other cities if Jacksonville did not accept it. In the end, the council voted to accept the more then 300-thousand dollars for the JSO.
Councilman Clay Yarborough voted against the money. He said his objection is not about what the money was for.
"My reason to vote against the bill, as did a few other council members, was because of the source of the funds," Yarborough said.
He thinks if more city turn down the money it would send a bigger message to Washington that they don't approve of the stimulus plan.
That is similar to objections from Councilman Steven Joost.
"To me it is a waste of money. This is a waste of taxpayer money," Joost said.
Two other members, Michael Corrigan and Bill Bishop, voted to turn down the money.
Bishop said he would consider voting for other projects if they could prove that they would bring in more jobs, but this did not meet his standard.
The sheriff supported the money, saying national battles do not need to be fought on the local level and that the money would go to other cities if Jacksonville did not accept it. In the end, the council voted to accept the more then 300-thousand dollars for the JSO.
What others are saying
- STIMULUS...again?Funny... but I thought the officers had to get some kind of DEGREE to qualify for service ON THEIR OWN! Are we now going to have to pay for UNDEDICATED people to get the jobs we really do not want on the police force? These passionate folks who wish to make a difference by going through the effort and sacrifice to make the grade should be held in places of high HONOR! Not to be polluted with those who just want a paycheck and/or carry a gun in pursuit of some kind of sick POWER!
- Wrong and rightI support the turning down the money. its the right to do. Jeff is correct. National battles must be fought on the local level first.
- WrongThe Sheriff is wrong. National battles must be fought on the local level first. Does the federal government take money from local citizens? Yes. Are these programs they take money for constitutional? No! We, the local people must fight this big government intrusion into our lives and our pockets!
advertisement
Jacksonville weatherThunderstorm95°F 5-day forecast | Hurricane Guide |
![]() |
advertisement
Marketplace
From fast food to fine dining, find it all in our Local Business Directory .Good marketing doesnt cost money, it PAYS! Your business needs to be marketing in this economy
Shop for cars, find a dealer, and get the latest automotive news in our Local Car Buying Guide powered by AutoTrader.com
Stay ahead of the storm. Find evacuation routes, safety tips and more in the Hurricane Guide.advertisement
Need to get away or planning a vacation? Let us, and our partners at Travel Channel, help. Click here to find out more.
Become one of thousands who paid so little at Arlington Toyota







